๐Ÿšš complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.4/5 from 975+ reviews
Men โœ“ In Stock ๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

JNCO jeans lucky 7 vintage

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.4 out of 5 (975 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$15
$25
Sale
โœ“ gratis fulfillment on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Medium wash denim Lucky 7 patch on frontDice and 7 on back pocket 22 baggy legsSize large34 waist

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
immediate Shipping
โ†ฉ๏ธ
practical Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

JNCO jeans lucky 7 vintage

Medium wash denim
Lucky 7 patch on front
Dice and 7 on back pocket
22" baggy legs
Size large
34" waist

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Men products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 29740

Category: Men > Jeans > Baggy, Loose

Original Price: $25 USD

Sale Price: $15 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

๐Ÿšš fulfillment & Returns

โœ“ at no charge distribution on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days​

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.4
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 4112 reviews
RH
Ryan Hill
1 month ago ยท Miami, FL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
A+ quality
At this point, Iโ€™m satisfied with the JNCO jeans lucky 7 vintage.
23 people found this helpful
TT
Thomas Taylor โœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago ยท San Diego, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
No complaints
Reliable and practical JNCO jeans lucky 7 vintage.
33 people found this helpful
JB
Justin Baker โœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago ยท Indianapolis, IN
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
adore this JNCO jeans lucky 7 vintage!
I had no difficulty using the JNCO jeans lucky 7 vintage.
35 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson โœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago ยท Minneapolis, MN
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Brilliant JNCO jeans lucky 7 vintage
Personally, it performs as expected so itโ€™s acceptable.
34 people found this helpful
AH
Andrew Hall โœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago ยท Raleigh, NC
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
extremely happy
Honestly, the JNCO jeans lucky 7 vintage works well enough so itโ€™s acceptable.
47 people found this helpful