๐Ÿšš complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.8/5 from 350+ reviews
Vintage โœ“ In Stock ๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller 

1960s Smith Corona Coronet Typewriter

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.8 out of 5 (350 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$60
$100
Sale
โœ“ gratis fulfillment on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Still works! A timeless for any writer!

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
expedient Shipping
โ†ฉ๏ธ
effortless Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

1960s Smith Corona Coronet Typewriter

Still works! A retro for any writer!​

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 264294

Category: Vintage > Antiques > Electronics

Original Price: $100 USD

Sale Price: $60 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand purely-arrived

๐Ÿšš distribution & Returns

โœ“ gratis delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.8
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 4836 reviews
ET
Emily Thompson โœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago ยท Cincinnati, OH
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
A must-have
fancy how plain and useful this 1960s Smith Corona Coronet Typewriter is.
1 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis โœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago ยท Minneapolis, MN
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
superb quality
Personally, the 1960s Smith Corona Coronet Typewriter feels okay so Iโ€™m okay with it.
34 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท San Antonio, TX
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Impressed!
The 1960s Smith Corona Coronet Typewriter works marvelous for daily use.
29 people found this helpful
EY
Elizabeth Young โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท San Diego, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
exceptional 1960s Smith Corona Coronet Typewriter!
For the price, it is practical so no complaints.
10 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis โœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago ยท Fort Worth, TX
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Simply fantastic
For the price, it works fine and it works for me.
48 people found this helpful