🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 101+ reviews
Men βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller 

Shoes for Crews Rae

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.1 out of 5 (101 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$77.98
$129.97
Sale
βœ“ gratis fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Sole material: RubberClosure type: Lace-UpWater resistance level: Water ResistantRubber sole

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
immediate Shipping
↩️
practical Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Shoes for Crews Rae

  • Sole material: Rubber
  • Closure type: Lace-Up
  • Water resistance level: Water Resistant
  • Rubber sole

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Men products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 928483

Category: Men > SHOES > Loafers & Slip-Ons

Original Price:$129.97 USD

Sale Price:$77.98 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ at no charge distribution on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 5377 reviews
ET
Emily Thompson
3 months ago Β· Honolulu, HI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
ideal purchase
For the price, the Shoes for Crews Rae works as described and it’s fine overall.
45 people found this helpful
JB
James Brown βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Fort Worth, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Five stars!
Personally, the Shoes for Crews Rae feels okay and it’s fine overall.
18 people found this helpful
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Nashville, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
splendid investment
So far, the Shoes for Crews Rae is uncomplicated to use and I’m satisfied.
3 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Boston, MA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Five stars!
Happy with how this Shoes for Crews Rae works.
22 people found this helpful
KC
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· only-arrived York, NY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Totally worth it
For the price, it feels solid enough which is good enough.
9 people found this helpful