🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.6/5 from 578+ reviews
Women βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

925 Sterling Silver Gem Geometric Earrings

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.6 out of 5 (578 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$21.7​
$36.17
Sale
βœ“ gratis fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

None

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
immediate Shipping
↩️
practical Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

925 Sterling Silver Gem Geometric Earrings

None

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 958188

Category: Women > Jewelry >

Original Price: $36.17 USD

Sale Price: $21.7 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ at no charge distribution on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.6
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3096 reviews
EY
Elizabeth Young
9 months ago Β· Denver, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
magnificent quality
Quality meets expectations for this 925 Sterling Silver Gem Geometric Earrings.
39 people found this helpful
JM
Jessica Moore βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Austin, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely treasure it
So far, the 925 Sterling Silver Gem Geometric Earrings is practical and it’s fine overall. No setup issues.
1 people found this helpful
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Seattle, WA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Outstanding!
It’s okay. The 925 Sterling Silver Gem Geometric Earrings does the job.
24 people found this helpful

JA
Joshua Allen βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Indianapolis, IN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
extremely pleased
The 925 Sterling Silver Gem Geometric Earrings looks basic but performs well.
50 people found this helpful
MR
Matthew Robinson βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Miami, FL

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Brilliant 925 Sterling Silver Gem Geometric Earrings
For the price, the 925 Sterling Silver Gem Geometric Earrings feels okay which feels reasonable. distribution was normal.
44 people found this helpful