🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.7/5 from 878+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage Lot of Medical Items

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.7 out of 5 (878 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$15.1​
$25.17
Sale
βœ“ gratis fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Please view each pic for details Sold as a Lot

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
immediate Shipping
↩️
practical Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Lot of Medical Items

Please view each pic for details
Sold as a Lot

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 988636

Category: Vintage > Antiques > 50 to 75 Years

Original Price: $25.17 USD

Sale Price: $15.1 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ at no charge distribution on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.7
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 6738 reviews
WG
William Garcia βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Portland, OR
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
purely what I wanted
Nice design and good build quality Vintage Lot of Medical Items.
6 people found this helpful
TM
Tyler Mitchell βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Aurora, CO

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
So happy with this
In daily use, the Vintage Lot of Medical Items feels solid so it’s acceptable. fulfillment was normal.
33 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans βœ“ Verified Purchase​
1 month ago Β· Fort Worth, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
superb for my needs
At first, the Vintage Lot of Medical Items feels okay and I don’t regret it.
49 people found this helpful
MK
Megan King βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Sacramento, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
extremely pleased
For the price, the Vintage Lot of Medical Items feels okay which is good enough.
20 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Minneapolis, MN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Outstanding quality
In daily use, it feels okay which is good enough.
5 people found this helpful