🚚 complimentary SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 586+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage Daewoo CD Radio Cassette player

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.9 out of 5 (586 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$45
$75
Sale
βœ“ gratis fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

It every works! Tested all functions! Cool cute little radio!

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
expedient Shipping
↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Daewoo CD Radio Cassette player

It whole works! Tested all functions! Cool cute little radio!

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2499896

Category: Vintage > Electronics > Radios

Original Price: $75 USD

Sale Price: $45 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand purely-arrived

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ gratis delivery on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.9
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 2935 reviews
KG
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Las Vegas, NV
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Simply extraordinary
The Vintage Daewoo CD Radio Cassette player performs nicely.
2 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Virginia Beach, VA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
exceptional Vintage Daewoo CD Radio Cassette player
Quality is not bad.
22 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Highly satisfied
extremely satisfied buyer. Good Vintage Daewoo CD Radio Cassette player.
9 people found this helpful​
CE
Christina Evans βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Nashville, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly urge!
Not the top, not the worst. Vintage Daewoo CD Radio Cassette player is okay.
25 people found this helpful
LN
Lauren Nelson βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· San Antonio, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Couldn't be happier
After a few use, the Vintage Daewoo CD Radio Cassette player works well enough and it’s fine overall.
21 people found this helpful